Le jeu. 7 nov. 2024 à 04:19, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 08:32:52AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Okay, applied 0001 and 0002 then after a second lookup. I'll spend > > some more time thinking about 0003 and the other threads. > > Considered 0003, and I'm still not sure that this is something that > is really required based on the correlation that are now possible with > the number of times a query has been called and the number of > planned/launched workers. > > I'm fine with your decision. After using the new metrics, we'll probably see more clearly if that's enough. > So I am marking the entry as committed. Let's see about the threads > for the addition of this data at table-level and at the > database-level. > Sounds good! Table level is probably not the most important in my view. Database-level and logging are what really matters to me. Thanks. -- Guillaume.
