Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunk...@aiven.io> writes:
> Le mercredi 1 septembre 2021, 19:27:35 heure normale d’Europe centrale Tom
> Lane a écrit :
>> The rest of this is stuck pending investigation of the ideas about
>> making new-style function creation safer when the creation-time path
>> isn't secure, so I suppose we should mark it RWF rather than leaving
>> it in the queue. Will go do that.
> Sorry to revive such an old thread but ... since the introduction of the
> @extschema:name@ syntax in 72a5b1fc880481914da2d4233077438dd87840ca we can
> now
> proceed with this or am I missing something ?
Yeah, seems like we could make it work with that.
> I've updated the previous patches to convert them to the new-style, added one
> for lo as well.
The cfbot says many of these fail regression tests --- lots of
CREATE EXTENSION citext SCHEMA s;
+ERROR: extension "citext" has no installation script nor update path for
version "1.8"
and such. I didn't poke into why, but maybe you missed "git add'ing"
some changes?
regards, tom lane
