On 30.10.24 10:03, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 at 16:51, Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote:
Thoughts?
+ snprintf(xloc, sizeof(xloc), "%X/%X",
LSN_FORMAT_ARGS(logptr))
+ pq_sendstring(&buf, xloc);
nit: I feel that sending the LSN as a string seems unnecessarily
wasteful of bytes. I'd rather send it as its binary representation.
My thinking here was: This protocol is also used by things that are not
PostgreSQL. They might have other representations for "position to wait
for". I don't know, but it's something to think about.
