On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The actual implementation could use another round of consideration. I > wonder how this should interact with min_wal_size. Wouldn't > min_wal_size = 0 already do what we need (if you could set it to 0, > which is currently not possible)?
Hmm, would that actually disable recycling, or just make it happen only rarely? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
