"Andrey M. Borodin" <x4...@yandex-team.ru> writes:
> This thread has associated CF entry which is marked as RwF [0]. But the
> change proved to be useful [1] in understanding what we can expect from time
> source.
> It was requested many times before [2,3]. Reading through this thread it
> seems to me that my questions about application of the pg_test_timing somehow
> switched focus from this patch. However, I'd appreciate if it was applied.
> Nanoseconds seem important to me.
> Let me know if I can help in any way. Thanks!
Basically, I think the code is ready, but I was awaiting Hannu's
proposal on rewriting the documentation for pg_test_timing.
Do you want to have a go at that?
regards, tom lane
