Em seg., 28 de out. de 2024 às 12:08, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
> Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> writes: > > It seems to me that [reversing the loop direction] is more optimized. > > That's far from clear: you're ignoring the possibility that memory > access logic is better optimized for forward scanning than reverse > scanning. I'd stick with the forward scan without some extremely > detailed testing. > I don't disagree. After posting, I was wondering if the first possible is not zero, it should probably be at the beginning and not at the end. best regards, Ranier Vilela
