On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 1:07 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yasir <yasir.hussain.s...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 12:21 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> I forgot to mention a third problem, which is that reassigning the > >> alias during subquery pullup means it doesn't happen if subquery > >> pullup doesn't happen. > > > Yes, that is by design. > > By design? How can you claim that's not a bug? The alias(es) > associated with a VALUES clause surely should not vary depending > on whether the clause includes a volatile function --- not to > mention other unobvious reasons for flattening to happen or not. > By design of my solution, I was not taking it as a bug. But now, I agree with your opinion. > > regards, tom lane >
