On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 08:03 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 05:01 +0300, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > What you write above indicates that "relpages" = 0 and "reltuples" > > > 0 > > would also be acceptable. > > As Tom pointed out, that creates a risk that it's interpreted as > infinite tuple denisity. > > The only functional change in my patch is to create the partitioned > table with relpages=-1 to be more consistent with the value after it's > analyzed.
Great, then it cannot be wrong. Sorry for the noise! Yours, Laurenz Albe
