Hi, Hackers! Current comments on the usage of WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH state that it should be used for scenarios of finishing other than immediately i.e. returning values and waiting for postmaster dies. In fact, in parts of the code, it's currently used to immediately exit or throw FATAL (in the walsender and in libpq).
So I propose change the comments on WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH stating that it could be used for both cases: for processing and setting return values if that's needed, and for immediate exit otherwise. Regards, Pavel Borisov Supabase
v1-0001-Refine-comments-on-usage-WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH.patch
Description: Binary data
