Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> 于2024年10月22日周二 05:52写道：
> On 2024-Oct-21, Tender Wang wrote:
>
> > I suspect that we don't need the below if
> > statement anymore.
> > /*
> > * If the referenced side is partitioned (which we know because our
> > * parent's constraint points to a different relation than ours) then
> > * we must, in addition to the above, create pg_constraint rows that
> > * point to each partition, each with its own action triggers.
> > */
> > if (parentConForm->conrelid != conform->conrelid)
> > {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > The above contidion is always true according to my test.
> > I haven't figured out an anti-case.
>
> You're right, this is useless, we can remove the 'if' line. I kept the
> block though, to have a place for all those local variable declarations
> (otherwise the code looks messier than it needs to).
>
Agree.
>
> I also noticed that addFkRecurseReferenced() is uselessly taking a List
> **wqueue argument but doesn't use it, so I removed it (as fallout, other
> routines don't need it either, especially DetachPartitionFinalize). I
> added some commentary on the creation of dependencies in
> addFkConstraint().
>
Yeah, I also noticed this before.
>
> I also include a few other cosmetic changes; just comment layout
> changes.
>
> This time I attach the patch for master only; the others have changed
> identically. 14 is unchanged from before. I figured that the conflict
> from 14 to 13 was trivial to resolve -- it was just because of DETACH
> CONCURRENTLY, so some code moves around, but that's all that happens.
>
>
I don't find any other problems with the newest patch.
--
Thanks,
Tender Wang
