> On 16 Oct 2024, at 06:57, David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> I’m for the status-quo. We don’t imply removal when we say deprecated, only > that (usually) a better alternative exists. This setup meets our existing > standards. The status-quo is inconsistency, we sometimes remove features we've marked as deprecated and sometimes they are kept. -- Daniel Gustafsson
