> On 10 Oct 2024, at 09:22, Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonne...@datadoghq.com> > wrote:
> psql tries to read the previous word when matches are NULL. However, > there's no previous word set here, leading to the segfault. > > I've attached a patch that checks if the previous word does exist > before trying to use it, along with an additional test for this > codepath. Nice, I was just typing up an email with the same fix when your landed in my inbox after having ended up with a segfaulting psql testing a patch. (I didn't include a test though so yours is better.) From reading the code I agree that we must check previous_words_count here so +1 on this patch. -- Daniel Gustafsson
