On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:08 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > btsugieyuusuke <btsugieyuus...@oss.nttdata.com> writes: > >> Therefore, shouldn't “f:” and “w:” be removed? > > Looks like that to me too. Pushed.
Thanks to Yusuke-san for the report and patch and to Tom for the commit. I vaguely recall that early in the development of pg_walsummary I thought it was going to need more options than and then realized that some of them weren't necessary. Looks like I did a bad job removing the leftovers; thanks for cleaning it up. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
