On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 4:55 AM David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 06:17, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> wrote: > > Why did you change "Disabled" from an integer to a boolean? > > I just don't think "Disabled Nodes" is all that self-documenting and > I'm also unsure why the full integer value of disabled_nodes is > required over just displaying the boolean value of if the node is > disabled or not. Won't readers look at the remainder of the plan to > determine information about which other nodes are disabled? Do we need > to give them a running total?
I don't think this will produce the right answer in all cases because disabled node counts don't propagate across subquery levels. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
