On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 8:34 PM Florents Tselai <florents.tse...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I’m in the process of trying to restore some PG15/16 backups in PG17. > > While playing with different -t and -n combinations I was browsing through > the docs. > > In *pg_restore* there are two notes about both -t / -n > > > When -n / -t is specified, pg_dump makes no attempt to ... > > In pg_dump though there’s the equivalent note only for the -t option. > > Shouldn’t it be a note as well for -n ? > > Otherwise I would expect -n to cascade the restore to objects in other > schemas; > Which I don’t think it does. > > Am I missing something? > Ah, swapped them by mistake on the previous email: They're both available in the pg_dump and note on -n missing in pg_restore. The question remains though: Shouldn’t there be a note about -n in pg_restore ?
