On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 1:21 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> On 2024/09/17 11:47, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2024/09/16 23:30, Anton A. Melnikov wrote:
> >> +1
> >> This idea seems quite tenable to me.
> >>
> >> There is a small clarification. Now if there were no skipped restartpoints 
> >> then
> >> restartpoints_done will be equal to restartpoints_timed + 
> >> restartpoints_req.
> >> Similar for checkpoints.
> >> So i tried to introduce num_done counter for checkpoints in the patch 
> >> attached.
> >
> > Thanks for the patch! I believe this change is targeted for v18. For v17, 
> > however,
> > we should update the description of num_timed in the documentation. Thought?
> > Here's a suggestion:
> >
> > "Number of scheduled checkpoints due to timeout. Note that checkpoints may 
> > be
> > skipped if the server has been idle since the last one, and this value 
> > counts
> > both completed and skipped checkpoints."
>
> Patch attached.
> Unless there are any objections, I plan to commit this and back-patch it to 
> v17.

I've checked this patch, it looks good to me.

Generally, it looks like I should be in charge for this, given I've
committed previous patch by Anton.  Thank you for reacting here faster
than me.  Please, go ahead with the patch.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
Supabase


Reply via email to