On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 09:38:32AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> FWIW, I was thinking about something like what has been done in
> indexcmds.c for 5bbdfa8a18dc as the query ID value is not predictible
> across releases, but we could see whether it is set or not.

By the way, with the main issue fixed as of 933848d16dc9, could it be
possible to deal with the plan cache part in a separate thread?  This
is from the start a separate thread to me, and we've done quite a bit
here already.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to