I compiled the patch and it worked without any problems. I think the patch makes sense, because of the structure of the current docs. It seems more logical to have this section in this part of the documentation, where it is useful and not only described for another chapter, because it won't even work with the current chapter it is referenced in ("Continous Archiving and Point-in-Time Recovery (PITR)").
I am still new to Postgres, so I can't tell whether it can be written more detailed or not. But I really like it, that is in a more fitting chapter in my opinion. Regards, Marlene Reiterer Am Mo., 16. Sept. 2024 um 10:35 Uhr schrieb David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com>: > > A documentation comment came in [1] causing me to review some of our backup > documentation and I left the current content and location of the standalone > backups was odd. I propose to move it to a better place, under file system > backups. > > Adding to commitfest. > > David J. > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKFQuwZ%3DWxdWJ6O66yQ9dnWTLO12p7h3HpfhowCj%2B0U_bNrzdg%40mail.gmail.com >