On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 06:41:30PM -0300, Marcos Pegoraro wrote: > Em sex., 13 de set. de 2024 às 13:39, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> > escreveu: > > I changed the patch to use the section symbol "§" instead of showing > the hashes. The hashes seemed too detailed. Does anyone see a better > symbol to use from here? > > > Robert and others liked commit hashes because you can do "git show $COMMITID"
We have to consider the small percentage of people who will want to do that vs the number of people reading the release notes. I think it is reasonable to require someone to click on the link to see the hash. > On my first email I used numbered links, because when you have several links > you know which one was clicked lastly True, and the section symbol makes it even less clear. > And brackets were useful to separate description, authors and commit links of > that item. Right, but without hashes, the section mark is clear. > Anyway, one way or another, I'm ok because it's committed. We can easily change it if we decide we want something else. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means "Am I going to die soon?"
