On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 5:09 AM Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>
> On 07.08.24 22:54, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
> > Here are some fixes based on outstanding feedback (some old some new).
>
> I have studied your patches v39-0001 through v39-0004, which correspond
> to what had been reverted plus the new empty range check plus various
> minor fixes. This looks good to me now, so I propose to go ahead with that.
Sounds good. Thanks!
> Btw., in your 0003 you point out that this prevents using the WITHOUT
> OVERLAPS functionality for non-range types. But I think this could be
> accomplished by adding an "is empty" callback as a support function or
> something like that. I'm not suggesting to do that here, but it might
> be worth leaving a comment about that possibility.
Yes, I was thinking the same. Agreed as well: it should be a follow-up
patch, not needed for the base functionality. If we wanted a more
generic name it could be "canWithoutOverlap" instead of "[!]isempty",
but even "isempty" is probably still completely accurate.
Yours,
--
Paul ~{:-)
p...@illuminatedcomputing.com
