On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 16:32, Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think you need to maintain CATALOG_VERSION_NO change in your > patch for the exact reason you have mentioned: patch will get conflict > each time CATALOG_VERSION_NO is advanced. It's responsibility of > committer to advance CATALOG_VERSION_NO when needed. > OK, I got it. My intention here was to help to test the patch. If someone wants to have a look at the patch, he won't need to make changes in the code. In the next iteration, I'll remove CATALOG_VERSION_NO version change. -- Best regards, Maxim Orlov.
