> I'm not convinced > that this problem would arise often enough in practice that it's worth > adding a feature to address it. A user who has this problem can pretty > easily do some scripting to address it
> AFAICS this proposal also represents a tiny use case. Thanks Robert and Euler for the feedback. Ack, Initially while working on the solution I thought this can be a common problem. But I agree if the use case is small we can postpone supporting such syntax for the future. I can then withdraw the patch. Regards Ayush Vatsa AWS
