Hi Bertrand, On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 10:00 PM Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, at the same place as the static lsn[] declaration, something like: > > static XLogRecPtr lsn[NUM_SYNC_REP_WAIT_MODE]; /* cached LSNs */ > > but that may just be a matter of taste. > I've updated the patch to reflect that. > > Right, we may want to cast it then but given that the for loop is "small" I > think > that's also fine to keep the for loop. > Ah I see what you mean. I've updated these changes and attached the patch to the other thread. Thanks, -- John Hsu - Amazon Web Services
