On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 1:44 PM Jacob Champion <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > https://github.com/psycopg/psycopg2/blob/658afe4cd90d3e167d7c98d22824a8d6ec895b1c/tests/test_async.py#L89 > > https://github.com/infusion/PHP/blob/7ebefb6426bb4b4820a30cca5c3a10bfd757b6ea/ext/pgsql/pgsql.c#L864
IMHO these examples establish beyond doubt that the existing function really is being used in ways that would break if we committed the proposed patch. To be honest, I'm slightly surprised, because protocol version 2 has been so dead for so long that I would not have anticipated people would even bother checking for it. But these examples show that some people do. If Jacob found these examples this easily, there are probably a bunch of others. It's not worth breaking existing code to avoid adding one new libpq entrypoint. Let's just add the new function and move on. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
