Hi, On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 06:05:19PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > That looks good to me. Does anyone have a different opinion? If not, > I'll go ahead and commit (but not backport) this change.
What is the rationale not to backpatch this? The error message changes, but we do not translate configure output, so is this a problem/project policy to never change configure output in the back-branches? If the change is too invasive, would something like the initial patch I suggested (i.e., in the absense of pkg-config, add a more targetted error message) be acceptable for the back-branches? Michael
