Hi On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki < tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> From: Markus Wanner [mailto:markus.wan...@2ndquadrant.com] > > equally sure there are well intended ones as well. For example, I'd > > expect patent pools (including the Open Invention Network, cited by the > > OP) to hire non-IANAL personnel who know Legalese well enough to setup > > valid contracts (between participating companies). > > I think I'll consult Open Invention Network on this issue, since I haven't > received any reply from SFLC. > SFLC have acted as the projects counsel in the past, so I'm not surprised they aren't talking to you; you won't be a known contact to them as a PG contributor, and as a Fujitsu employee there would likely be a conflict of interest for them to talk to you. > > > I certainly like the (future) patent holder coming forth to offer a > > grant a lot better than the one who doesn't (but still holds the > > patent). I'm missing the appreciation for that former strategy in this > > thread and fear we're setting a precedent for the latter one, instead. > > Me too. > > > Regards > Takayuki Tsunakawa > > -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
