> On 26 Jul 2024, at 20:29, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One of my chronic complaints about comments is > that they should say why we're doing things, not what we're doing. Agreed. > I feel like any > place where we are doing X because of some property of a non-PG code > base with which a particular reader might not be familiar, we should > have a comment explaining why we're doing it. And especially if it's > security-relevant. I'm sure there are more interactions with OpenSSL, and TLS in general, which warrants better comments but the attached takes a stab at the two examples in question here to get started (to avoid perfect get in the way of progress). -- Daniel Gustafsson
openssl_comments.diff
Description: Binary data
