On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 at 07:18, Joseph Koshakow <kosh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Attached is a patch that resolves an overflow in pg_size_pretty() that > resulted in unexpected behavior when PG_INT64_MIN was passed in as an > argument.
Could we just fix this more simply by assigning the absolute value of the signed variable into an unsigned type? It's a bit less code and gets rid of the explicit test for PG_INT64_MIN. David
pg_size_pretty_bigint_fix.patch
Description: Binary data
