On 2024-07-22 Mo 9:29 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 12:53 PM Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> wrote:On 2024-07-22 Mo 12:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Masahiko Sawada<sawada.m...@gmail.com> writes: Looking at dodo's failures, it seems that while it passes module-xid_wraparound-check, all failures happened only during testmodules-install-check-C. Can we check the server logs written during xid_wraparound test in testmodules-install-check-C? Oooh, that is indeed an interesting observation. There are enough examples now that it's hard to dismiss it as chance, but why would the two runs be different? It's not deterministic. I tested the theory that it was some other concurrent tests causing the issue, but that didn't wash. Here's what I did: for f in `seq 1 100` do echo iteration = $f meson test --suite xid_wraparound || break done It took until iteration 6 to get an error. I don't think my Ubuntu instance is especially slow. e.g. "meson compile" normally takes a handful of seconds. Maybe concurrent tests make it more likely, but they can't be the only cause.Could you provide server logs in both OK and NG tests? I want to see if there's a difference in the rate at which tables are vacuumed.
See <https://bitbucket.org/adunstan/rotfang-fdw/downloads/xid-wraparound-result.tar.bz2>
The failure logs are from a run where both tests 1 and 2 failed. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
