Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 9:32 AM Melanie Plageman > <melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Andres has suggested in the past that we allow maintenance_work_mem be >> set to a lower value or introduce some kind of development GUC so that >> we can more easily test multiple pass index vacuuming. Do you think >> this would be worth it?
> No, I don't.
I don't see why that's not a good idea.
regards, tom lane
