Hi ne 21. 7. 2024 v 17:13 odesÃlatel Kirill Reshke <reshkekir...@gmail.com> napsal:
> Hi! > I'm interested in the vacuum concurrently feature being inside the > core, so will try to review patch set and give valuable feedback. For > now, just a few little thoughts.. > > > > One more thing is about pg_squeeze background workers. They act in an > autovacuum-like fashion, aren't they? Maybe we can support this kind > of relation processing in core too? > I don't think it is necessary when this feature will be an internal feature. I agree so this feature is very important, I proposed it (and I very happy so Tonda implemented it), but I am not sure, if usage of this should be automatized, and if it should be, then a) probably autovacuum should do, b) we can move a discussion after vacuum full concurrently will be merged to upstream, please. Isn't very practical to have too many open targets. Regards Pavel
