On 2024-Jul-18, David HJ wrote: > As a long-time PostgreSQL user, I've increasingly run into issues with the > 63-byte limit for identifiers, particularly table names. This limit, while > historically sufficient, is becoming a significant pain point in modern > database design and usage.
This has been discussed before. I think the latest discussion, and some preliminary proof-of-concept patches, were around here: https://postgr.es/m/CAFBsxsF2V8n9w0SGK56bre3Mk9fzZS=9aaa8gfs_n+woa3d...@mail.gmail.com -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "In fact, the basic problem with Perl 5's subroutines is that they're not crufty enough, so the cruft leaks out into user-defined code instead, by the Conservation of Cruft Principle." (Larry Wall, Apocalypse 6)
