Hi, On 2024-07-16 15:53:45 -0500, Tristan Partin wrote: > Other than that, it looks pretty solid.
Thanks for looking! I'm thinking of pushing the first few patches soon-ish. I'm debating between going for 17 + HEAD or also applying it to 16, to keep the trees more similar. > Looks like we could help future us out by teaching compiler.find_library() > to take a list of names to look at similar to how dependency() works now. Yep, that'd be useful. Andres
