On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 4:06 AM David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've been wondering about the order of the "path" column. When we > talked, I had in mind that the TopMemoryContext should always be at > the end of the array rather than the start, but I see you've got it > the other way around.
FWIW, I would have done what Melih did. A path normally is listed in root-to-leaf order, not leaf-to-root. > I also imagined "path" would be called "context_ids". I thought that > might better indicate what the column is without consulting the > documentation. The only problem I see with this is that it doesn't make it clear that we're being shown parentage or ancestry, rather than values for the current node. I suspect path is fairly understandable, but if you don't like that, what about parent_ids? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
