On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 04:51:52PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > Here's a rebase. I decided against committing this for v17 in the > end. There's not much wrong with it AFAIK, except perhaps an > unprincipled chopping up of writes with large io_combine_limit due to > simplistic flow control, and I liked the idea of having a decent user > of smgrwritev() in the tree, and it probably makes CREATE INDEX a bit > faster, but... I'd like to try something more ambitious that > streamifies this and also the "main" writeback paths.
I see this in the CF as Needs Review since 2024-03-10, but this 2024-04-09 message sounds like you were abandoning it. Are you still commissioning a review of this thread's patches, or is the CF entry obsolete?
