On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 09:19:59PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> The bit I don't understand about this discussion is what will happen >> with users that currently have exactly 1024 chars in backup names today. >> With this change, we'll be truncating their names to 1023 chars instead. >> Why would they feel that such change is welcome? > > That's precisely what I was getting at. Maybe it makes sense to change, maybe > not, but that's not for this patch to decide as that's a different discussion > from using safe string copying API's.
Yep. Agreed to keep backward-compatibility here, even if I suspect there is close to nobody relying on backup label names of this size. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
