On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 07:58:55AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 7:52 AM Joel Jacobson <j...@compiler.org> wrote: >> Want me to fix that or will the committer handle that? >> >> I found some more similar cases in acronyms.sgml. > > Given this I'd be OK with committing as-is in the name of matching existing > project style. Then bringing up this inconsistency as a separate concern > to be bulk fixed as part of implementing a new policy on what to check for > and conform to when establishing acronyms in our documentation. > > Otherwise the author (you) should make the change here - the committer > wouldn't be expected to know to do that from the discussion.
If I was writing these patches, I'd create a separate 0001 patch to fix the existing problems, then 0002 would be just the new stuff (without the inconsistency). But that's just what I'd do; there's no problem with doing it the other way around. -- nathan
