On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 7:40 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > Very good catch! It looks like you have seen that in the field, then. > Sad face.
Yeah, this happened last week on one of our replicas (version 15.5) last week that had 134 days uptime. We are doing a lot of parallel queries on this cluster so the combination of high uptime plus parallel workers creation eventually triggered the issue. > Will fix and backpatch, thanks for the report! Thanks for handling this and for the quick answer! Regards, Anthonin
