On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:19 AM Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2 ==== > > Should we rename StandbySlotNamesConfigData too? >
How about SyncStandbySlotsConfigData? > 3 ==== > > Should we rename SlotExistsInStandbySlotNames too? > Similarly SlotExistsInSyncStandbySlots? > 4 ==== > > Should we rename validate_standby_slots() too? > And validate_sync_standby_slots()? --- a/doc/src/sgml/release-17.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-17.sgml @@ -1325,7 +1325,7 @@ Author: Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> <!-- Author: Amit Kapila <akap...@postgresql.org> -2024-03-08 [bf279ddd1] Introduce a new GUC 'standby_slot_names'. +2024-03-08 [bf279ddd1] Introduce a new GUC 'synchronized_standby_slots'. I am not sure if it is a good idea to change release notes in the same commit as the code change. I would prefer to do it in a separate commit. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
