On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 3:26 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > I used this in v4 (with some minor changes).
Looking at this again, how happy are you with the way you've got several roles per <varlistentry> instead of one for each? I realize that was probably part of the intent of the change, to move the data from below the table into the table, and I see the merit of that. But one of your other complaints was the entries in the table were unordered, and it's hard for them to really be ordered if you have groups like this, since you can't alphabetize, for example, unless you have just a single entry per <varlistentry>. I don't have a problem with doing it the way you have here if you think that's good. I'm just asking. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
