On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 09:37, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I reviewed the documentation for "direct ALPN connections' ', and it looks > like it could be improved. > Here's the link: > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/protocol-flow.html#PROTOCOL-FLOW-SSL > > The currently suggested values for "sslnegotiations" are "direct" and > "postgres". > The project name is PostgreSQL and the ALPN name is postgresql. Is there a > reason why property value uses "postgres"? > Can the value be renamed to postgresql for consistency? > +1 I found it strange that we are not using postgresql > > "SSL". Technically, the proper term is TLS, and even the document refers > to "IANA TLS ALPN Protocol IDs" (TLS, not SSL). > I would not die on that hill, however, going for tlsnegotiation would look > better than sslnegotiation. > +1 again, unusual to use SSL when this really is TLS. Dave
