On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 1:49 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 03:50:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >>>>> Allow specification of physical standbys that must be synchronized > >>>>> before they are visible to subscribers (Hou Zhijie, Shveta Malik) > > > > it seems like the name ought to have some connection to > > synchronization. Perhaps something like "synchronized_standby_slots"? > > IMHO that might be a bit too close to synchronous_standby_names. >
Right, but better than the current one. The other possibility could be wait_for_standby_slots. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
