> On 12 Jun 2024, at 17:50, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2024-06-11 07:28:23 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
>> The OAuth pytest suite makes extensive use of >> - psycopg, to easily drive libpq; > > That's probably not going to fly. It introduces painful circular dependencies > between building postgres (for libpq), building psycopg (requiring libpq) and > testing postgres (requiring psycopg). I might be missing something obvious, but if we use a third-party libpq driver in the testsuite doesn't that imply that a patch adding net new functionality to libpq also need to add it to the driver in order to write the tests? I'm thinking about the SCRAM situation a few years back when drivers weren't up to date. -- Daniel Gustafsson
