On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 10:51:42AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > On 2024-06-10 Mo 10:14, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> I'm curious why we couldn't also support the "custom" format. > > We could, but the housekeeping would be a bit harder. We'd need to keep > pointers to the offsets of the per-database TOCs (I don't want to have a > single per-cluster TOC). And we can't produce it in parallel, so I'd rather > start with something we can produce in parallel.
Got it. -- nathan
