On Fri, Jun 7, 2024 at 2:39 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2024-Jun-07, Dilip Kumar wrote: > > > I think the compression option should be supported at the CREATE > > SUBSCRIPTION level instead of being controlled by a GUC. This way, we > > can decide on compression for each subscription individually rather > > than applying it to all subscribers. It makes more sense for the > > subscriber to control this, especially when we are planning to > > compress the data sent downstream. > > True. (I think we have some options that are in GUCs for the general > behavior and can be overridden by per-subscription options for specific > tailoring; would that make sense here? I think it does, considering > that what we mostly want is to save disk space in the publisher when > spilling to disk.)
Yeah, that makes sense. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
