Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 02:28:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hence, new patch attached, now with docs and tests. Barring
>> objections I'll push this one.
> Should we expand the documentation for SPI_connect_ext() to note that
> SPI_execute_extended()/SPI_execute_plan_extended() depend on the flag?
Perhaps. They already did, in that the atomic flag was taken into
account while deciding how to handle a nested CALL; basically what this
fix does is to make sure that the snapshot handling is done the same
way. I think that what I added to the docs is probably sufficient,
but I'll yield to majority opinion if people think not.
regards, tom lane
