On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:56 PM Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote: > Experimental is probably too harsh a word now. > > But it doesn't have feature parity with configure/make yet (for example, > no .bc files), so I wouldn't recommend it for production or packaging > builds.
That's unfortunate. :-( > Then, there are issues like [0]. If it's experimental, then this is > like, meh, we'll fix it later. If not, then it's a bug. This feels like a case where I'd have to read the entire thread to understand what the issue is. > More generally, I don't think we've really done a comprehensive check of > how popular extensions build against pgxs-from-meson. Packagers that > make their production builds using meson now might be signing up for a > long tail of the unknown. That's a fair point, and I don't know what to do about it, but it seems like something that needs to be addressed. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
