Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 07:31:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Could it be possible to get a patch from all the feedback and exchange >> gathered here? Petr, I think that it would not hurt if you use the set >> of words and comments you think is most adapted as the primary author of >> the feature. > > I have seen no patch, so attached is one to finally close the loop and > this open item, which includes both my suggestions and what Arseny has > mentioned based on the latest emails exchanged. Any objections to that? I'm practically happy with this. > * while confirmed_lsn is used as base point for the decoding context. This line is excessive as now we have comment below saying it doesn't matter. -- Arseny Sher Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
