On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, the original proposal was that we should be relaxed about it.
...in both directions i.e. DROP TABLE would work on a VIEW and DROP VIEW on a table. That definitely seems like it's going too far. > Another possibility that would also seem to meet the OP's needs is to > make it do this: > > DROP TABLE IF EXISTS X; > NOTICE: relation "X" is not a table, skipping > > His complaint was really that it generated an ERROR, IIUC. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
