> On 17 May 2024, at 07:57, Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote: > > On 16.05.24 23:27, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> On 16 May 2024, at 11:43, Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote: >>> You might want to run your patch through pgperltidy. The result doesn't >>> look bad, but a bit different than what you had crafted. >> Ugh, I thought I had but clearly had forgotten. Fixed now. >>> append_conf() opens and closes the file for each call. It might be nice if >>> it could accept a list. Or you can just pass the whole block as one >>> string, like it was done for pg_ident.conf before. >> The attached v2 pass the whole block as a here-doc which seemed like the best >> option to retain readability of the config. > > Works for me.
Thanks for review. Once the tree opens up for v18 I'll go ahead with this. -- Daniel Gustafsson